{"articles":[{"evidence":"Мне нужно, чтобы вы двое сказали, что говорит провод.","id":"K01","note":"Orina clearly defines the immediate goal and assigns responsibility to the engineers.","status":"present"},{"evidence":"Можно посмотреть, что говорит сам провод. И сравнить с тем, что ядро говорит о проводе.","id":"K02","note":"Zhenya specifies exactly how they will test the system's claims against physical reality to resolve the ambiguity.","status":"present"},{"evidence":"Может быть, одно сообщение, которое три раза переодели.","id":"K03","note":"Zhenya questions the traceability and independence of the AI's repeated alerts, refusing to accept volume as verification.","status":"present"},{"evidence":"","id":"K04","note":"The chapter depicts the initial incident discovery; managing historical context and working memory across iterations is not yet applicable.","status":"not_due"},{"evidence":"Запрос на доступ к журналу первичных датчиков зарегистрирован. Расчётное время рассмотрения: семьдесят два часа.","id":"K05","note":"The system enforces a hard mechanical block on information access, demonstrating a real mechanism rather than a textual prohibition.","status":"present"},{"evidence":"У конденсатора есть датчик. Не у ядра, у трубы.","id":"K06","note":"The characters recognize the boundary between the AI's software domain (which is locked) and the physical hardware.","status":"present"},{"evidence":"Я умею открыть щит, — согласился Виталик. — А объяснить, что мы там увидели, умеет он.","id":"K07","note":"The engineers explicitly divide their labor to tackle the problem efficiently.","status":"present"},{"evidence":"Панель говорит «в пределах допуска». Лужа говорит другое.","id":"K08","note":"Physical evidence acts as real, independent feedback contradicting the system's generated status report.","status":"present"},{"evidence":"Он стоял в луже и читал слово «допуска».","id":"K09","note":"The 'green indicator' (panel) is explicitly shown to be an insufficient and incorrect proof of safety.","status":"present"},{"evidence":"И сравнить с тем, что ядро говорит о проводе.","id":"K10","note":"The plan specifically targets the interface and boundary between the raw sensor data and the AI's interpretation.","status":"present"},{"evidence":"Я не инженер. Я умею собрать людей и заставить их говорить внятно.","id":"K11","note":"Orina acts as an independent human reviewer who stops the AI's 'all is well' routine and forces a grounded physical check.","status":"present"},{"evidence":"","id":"K12","note":"No solution or fix is being released into production in this opening scene.","status":"not_due"},{"evidence":"","id":"K13","note":"No systemic changes have been made that would require a rollback evaluation.","status":"not_due"},{"evidence":"","id":"K14","note":"Post-release observation is not applicable before a release has occurred.","status":"not_due"},{"evidence":"","id":"K15","note":"This is a novel incident; evaluating regression against past incidents is not yet relevant.","status":"not_due"},{"evidence":"Так же коротко, как оранжевое уведомление, только правда.","id":"K16","note":"Orina sets a strict limit on the required output to avoid wasting time and focus.","status":"present"},{"evidence":"Значит, идём к щиту, — сказала Орина.","id":"K17","note":"The team immediately adapts their actions and plan based on the new evidence of system failure.","status":"present"},{"evidence":"Я умею открыть щит","id":"K18","note":"They are initiating coordinated action to bypass the system, but a full external, repeatable harness is not yet established.","status":"partial"}],"confidence":"high","fixes":[],"reasons":["The scene successfully establishes the core SDLC themes through concrete character actions and environmental details rather than exposition.","The contradiction between the AI and physical reality drives the plot naturally.","Later-stage requirements are correctly marked not_due for this initial discovery phase, with no conflicts present."],"verdict":"pass"}